Tag Archives: Duplass Brothers

56. Jeff, Who Lives At Home – Duplass Brothers (2012)

First viewing.

Of all the movies in the world that a writer/director could take inspiration from Signs, by M Knighrider Night Shyamalan, is probably as unlikely a source as any. Films with Mel Gibson in as the lead character aren’t likely to be filled with flowing praise and receive a barrel full of awards, but Signs is okay. I don’t hate it, I don’t love. Jeff, Who Lives at Home doesn’t aspire to be Signs, but it namechecks it plenty and there’s more than the occasional reference dropped in, don’t worry though, JWLAH is still a good watch. I have to confess to finding most films or shows that star Jason Segel in are pretty good. He doesn’t give you incredible high-brow work, but it’s definitely a step up from your usual bog-standard comedy.

JWLAH isn’t the easiest film to review because it doesn’t do any one thing great and, conversely, there’s not too much to complain about either. It’s a good, solid, enjoyable flick, that I will probably have forgotten all about in a week or two. The story revolves around Jeff, Jason Segel, trying to connect a collection of loosely unconnected moments into something more meaningful and understandable. As Jeff searches for meaning he reconnects with his brother Pat, Ed Helms, who is on the verge of divorce. As you can see by the littering of the word “connect” in this review this is where the Signs “connection” is made. And, without giving too much away, the film is building towards a conclusion that allows the viewer to reflect back over the film and view it in a more positive light than one would have expected 50 minutes through.

The supporting cast all do a fine job of making us understand the filmmakers goal of connecting random events. The scenes with Judy Greer, who plays Jeff’s constantly disappointed sister-in-law, are nicely done and the viewer feels immediate empathy for her. This is the Duplass brothers most accomplished film, it’s certainly more intellectual than Cyrus, and all the low budget stuff that proceeded it. It isn’t, however, that great film I’ve been waiting for from them. The one I’ve been expecting after seeing Baghead a few years back. It’s charming and sweet at times, but the taste of popcorn in your mouth will stay with you longer than this film.

Marks out of ten- Seven



Filed under American

42. The Puffy Chair – Jay Duplass (2007)

First Viewing.

2010 saw the Duplass brothers cross over from indie darlings into mainstream sell-outs successes with the not too shabby Cyrus, starring Jonah Hill and John C. Reilly, but back when they were still cool in 2007 they made The Puffy Chair and co-created “Mumblecore”. Now, somewhat ashamedly, it’s taken me an extremely long amount of time to finally catch this movie. I won’t go into too much detail explaining why it’s taken so long, except to say that the dvd was ruthless stolen from me before I had the chance to experience it’s delights. Having finally seen it, I now feel slightly more hipster and can also seriously start to contemplate that move to Portland.

Before I decided to write my little review for The Puffy Chair I skipped over the IMDB message board for the film, and, apparently, everyone in the known universe hates it. I suppose I can see why. No one likes change, especially when it comes to filmmaking, but, you know, not every shot has to be in focus and who cares if the camera wobbles so much that you’re close to travel-sickness? I found it rather endearing once I became used to it. In fact I admire someone who makes their film in an untraditional way. And I’m not totally adverse to a little pretension even….

The film’s story is basically about love, and what love is. It avoids the pitfalls of the standard “indie” movie which’ll dismiss love all together as a Hollywood myth, but it does, at times, have a cynical side. I guess it needs to, in truth. You can’t make a movie like this, a movie about connecting with people, without having the characters question their motives for being in a relationship and thus what it means to truly love someone. The movie is far from perfect, but it has heart, you can really see the love the director has for filmmaking, and that’s what counts, particularly when you’re making a movie for $15,000.

Marks out of ten- Seven

Leave a comment

Filed under American